Trump signs order challenging liability protections that allow unfettered speech on internet
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump escalated his war on Twitter and other social media companies Thursday, signing an executive order challenging the lawsuit protections that have served as a bedrock for unfettered speech on the internet.
Announced with fanfare, the president’s action yet appeared to be more about politics than substance. He aims to rally supporters after he lashed out at Twitter for applying fact checks to two of his tweets.
Trump said the fact checks were “editorial decisions” by Twitter amounting to political activism and that such actions should cost social media companies their liability protection for what is posted on their platforms.
Trump, who personally relies heavily on Twitter to verbally flog his foes, has long accused the tech giants in liberal-leaning Silicon Valley of targeting conservatives by fact-checking them or removing their posts.
“We’re fed up with it,” Trump said, claiming his order would uphold freedom of speech.
Technology
industry groups disagreed, saying it would stifle innovation and speech
on the internet. And the U.S. Chamber of Commerce objected, “Regardless
of the circumstances that led up to this, this is not how public policy
is made in the United States.”
The executive order directs
executive branch agencies to ask independent rule-making agencies
including the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade
Commission to study whether they can place new regulations on the
companies — though experts express doubts much can be done without an
act of Congress.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said in a statement, “This
debate is an important one. The Federal Communications Commission will
carefully review any petition for rulemaking filed by the Department of
Commerce.”
Companies like Twitter and Facebook are granted
liability protection under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
because they are treated as “platforms,” rather than “publishers,”
which can face lawsuits over content.
A similar executive order
was previously considered by the administration but shelved over
concerns it couldn’t pass legal muster and that it violated conservative
principles on deregulation and free speech.
“They’ve had
unchecked power to censor, restrict, edit, shape, hide, alter virtually
any form of communication between private citizens or large public
audiences,” Trump said of social media companies as he prepared to sign
the order. “There is no precedent in American history for so small a
number of corporations to control so large a sphere of human
interaction.”
Trump and his campaign reacted after Twitter added a
warning phrase to two Trump tweets that called mail-in ballots
“fraudulent” and predicted “mail boxes will be robbed.” Under the
tweets, there’s now a link reading “Get the facts about mail-in ballots”
that guides users to a page with fact checks and news stories about Trump’s unsubstantiated claims.
Trump
accused Twitter of interfering in the 2020 presidential election” and
declared “as president, I will not allow this to happen.” His campaign
manager, Brad Parscale, said Twitter’s “clear political bias” had led
the campaign to pull “all our advertising from Twitter months ago.” In
fact, Twitter has banned political advertising since last November.
Late
Wednesday, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey tweeted, “We’ll continue to point
out incorrect or disputed information about elections globally.”
On
the other hand, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg told Fox News his platform
has “a different policy, I think, than Twitter on this.”
“I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn’t be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online,” he said.
The
president’s critics, meanwhile, scolded the platforms for allowing him
to put forth false or misleading information that could confuse voters.
Oregon
Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat and advocate for internet freedoms said
Trump was “desperately trying to steal for himself the power of the
courts and Congress. … All for the ability to spread unfiltered lies.”
Trump’s
proposal has multiple, serious legal problems and is unlikely to
survive a challenge, according to Matt Schruers, president of the
Computer and Communications Industry Association, a Washington-based
organization that represents computer and internet companies.
It
would also seem to be an assault on the same online freedom that enabled
social media platforms to flourish in the first place — and made them
such an effective microphone for Trump and other politicians.
“The
irony that is lost here is that if these protections were to go away
social media services would be far more aggressive in moderating content
and terminating accounts,” Schruers said. “Our vibrant public sphere of
discussion would devolve into nothing more than preapproved
soundbites.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said it was “outrageous”
that while Twitter had put a fact-check tag on Trump’s tweets asserting
massive mail-in election fraud, it had not removed his tweets repeating a
debunked conspiracy theory that a TV news host had murdered an aide
years ago.
The president and fellow conservatives have been
claiming, for years, that Silicon Valley tech companies are biased
against them. But there is no evidence for this — and while the
executives and many employees of Twitter, Facebook and Google may lean
liberal, the companies have stressed they have no business interest in
favoring one political party over the other.
The trouble began in
2016, two years after Facebook launched a section called “trending,”
using editors to curate popular news stories. Zuckerberg met with
prominent right-wing leaders at the time in an attempt at damage
control, and in 2018, Facebook shut down the “trending” section,.
In
August 2018, Trump accused Google of biased searches and warned the
company to “be careful.” Google pushed back sharply, saying Trump’s
claim simply wasn’t so, and experts suggested his comments showed a
misunderstanding of how search engines work.
Last year, Trump
again blasted social media companies after Facebook banned a slew of
extremist figures including conspiracy peddler Alex Jones from its site
and from Instagram.
Meanwhile, the companies are gearing up to
combat misinformation around the November elections. Twitter and
Facebook have begun rolling out dozens of new rules to avoid a repeat of
the false postings about the candidates and the voting process that
marred the 2016 election.
The coronavirus pandemic
has further escalated the platforms’ response, leading them to take
actions against politicians — a move they’ve long resisted — who make
misleading claims about the virus.
Last month, Twitter began a
“Get the Facts” label to direct social media users to news articles from
trusted outlets next to tweets containing misleading or disputed
information about the virus.
As the White House claimed that
Trump was the subject of a fact check but Chinese disinformation about
the coronavirus was not, Twitter moved Thursday to add a warning to a
March tweet from a Chinese government spokesman falsely claiming the
U.S. military spread the virus.
Even as he and his supporters
complain of bias on the platform, Trump has used Twitter to build a
potent and vocal online following. The president’s account currently has
more than 80 million followers.
Trump’s success on social media
suggests that his proposal may be more about politics than an actual
interest in regulation, according to Rutgers University media professor
John Pavlik, who studies the impact of technology on society and
government.
Pavlik said that by trying to intimidate the platforms
now, he’s seeking to control how the 2020 campaign plays out online and
“about appealing to his base.”
___
AP writers Amanda Seitz, Barbara Ortutay and David Klepper contributed.