Make wishtv.com your home page

Prosecutor: FedEx shooter didn’t have ‘red flag’ hearing

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — A former employee who shot and killed eight people at a FedEx facility in Indianapolis never appeared before a judge for a hearing under Indiana’s “red flag” law, even after his mother called police last year to say her son might commit “suicide by cop,” a prosecutor said Monday.

Marion County Prosecutor Ryan Mears said authorities did not seek such a hearing because they did not have enough time under the law’s restrictions to definitively demonstrate Brandon Scott Hole’s propensity for suicidal thoughts, something they would need to have done to convince a judge that Hole should not be allowed to possess a gun.

  • APP USERS: To watch Mears’ full press conference, click here

The “red flag” legislation, passed in Indiana in 2005 and also in effect in other states, allows police or courts to seize guns from people who show warning signs of violence. Police seized a pump-action shotgun from Hole, then 18, in March 2020 after they received the call from his mother.

While recovering the shotgun, one of the responding officers also witnessed “white supremist websites” on Hole’s computer after the teen asked officers to cut the power to his computer, according to a police probable cause narrative from the 2020 incident released Monday.

Mears said that prosecutors were limited in their ability to prepare a “red flag” case against Hole following that incident due to a 2019 change in the law that requires courts to make a “good-faith effort” to hold a hearing within 14 days. An additional amendment required them to file an affidavit with the court within 48 hours.

“This individual was taken and treated by medical professionals and he was cut loose,” and was not even prescribed any medication, Mears said. “The risk is, if we move forward with that (red flag) process and lose, we have to give that firearm back to that person. That’s not something we were willing to do.”

Indianapolis police previously said that they never did return the shotgun to Hole. Authorities have said he used two “assault-style” rifles to gun down eight people, four of them from the city’s Sikh community, at the FedEx facility last Thursday before he killed himself.

Police on Monday identified the high-capacity weapons used by Hole, who was 19 at the time of the shooting. One was a Ruger AR-556 Hole purchased in September. The second was an HM Defense HM15F he bought in July, just months after police had seized the pump-action shotgun. A Ruger AR-556 also was used last month in a shooting that killed 10 people in Boulder, Colorado.

Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms determined that Hole purchased the guns legally through authorized dealers, according to a police news release that did not name the dealers. The release also said FedEx terminated Hole in October when he failed to return to work.

A police probable cause affidavit narrative also released Monday states describes Hole’s March 2020 arrest, and a request he made to his arresting officers. “Brandon upon being placed in handcuffs became immediately anxious and stated, ‘Please just turn the power strip off on my computer. I don’t want anyone to see what’s on it,’” it states, before adding that while securing the shotgun an officer saw “what through his training and experience indicated was white supremist websites.”

Paul Keenan, special agent in charge of the FBI’s Indianapolis field office, said Friday that the FBI was contacted to the scene after items were found in Hole’s bedroom but he did not elaborate on what those were. He said agents found no evidence of a crime and that they did not identify Hole as espousing a racially motivated ideology.

Republican state Sen. Erin Houchin, a sponsor of tougher provisions added to Indiana’s red flag law in 2019, said in the Hole case the law “could have worked just as it should, but the prosecutor never pursued it.”

Those 2019 changes to the law made it a misdemeanor for a person deemed dangerous to buy or possess a gun and a felony offense for anyone to give or sell a gun to a dangerous person.

But Mears said there are still problems that need to be addressed. He said he had spoken to legislators in the past about lengthening the two-week timeline for holding a red flag hearing, and he reiterated that call on Monday. Extending the time frame would give prosecutors more time to investigate a person’s background and mental health history before going in front of a judge, he said. He added that he would also like to see the statute prohibit a person under investigation from buying a gun until the hearing is held and the judge makes a final ruling.

Mears said the red flag law is “a good start, but it’s far from perfect.”

“I think people hear ‘red flag’ and they think it’s the panacea to all these issues. It’s not,” he said.

Democratic state Rep. Ed DeLaney, a gun control advocate, said he hoped Republicans would be receptive to reviewing the law in the future. He said there isn’t time to force an immediate debate because the 2021 legislative session is slated to end later this week.

Paul Helmke, an Indiana University civics professor and former president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said Indiana’s law could be strengthened with mandated court hearings or language prohibiting a person from acquiring additional firearms until a judge issues an order about that person’s competency.

In Hole’s case, that would have meant that his family’s agreement to not ask for the seized gun back would not have been enough to avoid a court hearing, and could have prevented him from purchasing additional weapons, said Helmke, a former Republican mayor of Fort Wayne, Indiana.

“Indiana should be doing more to address these loopholes,” Helmke said.

Indiana was one of the first states to enact a red flag law, after an Indianapolis police officer was killed in 2004 by a man whose weapons were returned to him despite his hospitalization months earlier for an emergency mental health evaluation.

Indianapolis police recovered 191 guns last year under the red flag law, police said Monday in a release that did not say how many people that involved or the types of weapons.

___

Associated Press reporters Tom Davies and Rick Callahan contributed to this report. Casey Smith is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

PREVIOUS COVERAGE

INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) — There are still a lot of questions surrounding the FedEx mass shooting that left eight people dead. Many wonder how the gunman was able to legally buy the rifles used in the deadly shooting after police confirmed they had been in contact with the shooter in the past and took a weapon away from him.

Indiana was one of the first states to implement red flag laws, but some local experts said they don’t go far enough.

“With Indiana’s law, it is basically a gun removal law. It says that the police have a right to take someone’s existing gun. It doesn’t automatically stop them from buying other guns later. And that is one of the big loopholes in Indiana’s law,” said Paul Helmke.

Helmke is a professor at the Indiana University O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs. Helmke used to work for the Brady Center to prevent gun violence. He credits Indiana with the early implementation of red flag laws but is adamant they don’t go far enough.

“We have a law that says the police can come in and take existing guns away. But until there is a court order that says he is dangerous, he can go out and buy guns. And unless that court order that he is dangerous is sent to the background check system, then nobody is going to know that he is dangerous and they are allowed to sell him the guns,” said Helmke.

In the case of 19-year old Brandon Scott Hole, the FBI said in a statement that Hole’s mother had contacted police in March of 2020 and feared he would try to commit “suicide by cop.” This is when a person intends to provoke a lethal response from a public safety officer.

The FBI’s statement said that the teenager was placed on an immediate detention mental health temporary hold by the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department. Police found a shotgun at his house and removed it. He was then interviewed by the FBI in April of 2020 and the FBI said no racially motivated violent extremism ideology or criminal violation was found in his home. The shotgun that was seized at his residence was never returned.

According to Indiana red flag laws, authorities have two weeks after seizing someone’s weapons, to argue in court that the person should not have a gun. However, officials have not said whether a judge made a ruling in Hole’s March 2020 case.

“If there was a hearing, the judge at that hearing could have ordered basically made this shooter a prohibited purchaser, which would have meant he would not have been able to legally buy any more guns. But we don’t know whether there was a court hearing. If there was a court hearing, we don’t know whether there was a finding that he should be a prohibited purchaser or if there had been a court hearing and a finding that he should be a prohibited purchaser, we don’t know if that record was ever sent to the background check system,” said Helmke.

Helmke said the federal government cannot force states to send the prohibited purchaser record to the national instant background check system and often it doesn’t get done. Plus, after a year, the court orders often expire.

“If your name is not in the background check system as being a felon or being found dangerously mentally ill, you can buy any gun you want and as many guns, as you want. Something is wrong with that system,” said Helmke.

Helmke also notes that Indiana’s red flag law leaves the burden on the state to prove a person is still a danger 180 days after their firearms have been removed. Often, it defaults to people simply getting their weapons back. In this case, if every step was taken within Indiana laws, Helmke said the shooter still likely would have been able to legally obtain a weapon by the time of this mass shooting.

Hole was a former FedEx employee. He last worked for the company in 2020. Both IMPD and the FBI have made it clear the motive is still under investigation in the FedEx mass shooting.

Crime Map
Use Search Bars Above To Search Crime Data